David Stinson
2004-07-13 13:46:35 UTC
UN CONFIRMS WMDs SMUGGLED OUT OF IRAQ.
America has been feed and swallowed
a BIG LIE about Iraqi WMDs, and it wasn't from George Bush.
It was and continues to be from the New York Times, LA Times,
Whorllywood, NPR and most of the other major media outlets.
In fact, the U.N. now confirms that Iraq's WMDs were smuggled out-
they have even shown up in Holland (?!).
The bottom line is obvious: the leftist care far more about
grasping personal power than defending our people.
The do not care that their back-shooting is costing
our soldier's lives. They care only for their own perks,
and they will tell any lie, no matter how destructive.
And their sheep will believe it.
-------
UN Confirms: WMDs Smuggled Out of Iraq
© June 18, 2004, Rod D. Martin
Vangard
In a report which might alternately be termed “stunning” or
“terrifying”, United Nations weapons inspectors confirmed last week not
merely that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but that he
smuggled them out of his country, before, during and after the war.
Late last week, the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection
Commission (UNMOVIC) briefed the Security Council on Saddam's
lightning-fast dismantling of missile and WMD sites before and during
the war. UNMOVIC executive chairman Demetrius Perricos detailed not only
the export of thousands of tons of missile components, nuclear reactor
vessels and fermenters for chemical and biological warheads, but also
the discovery of many (but not most) of these items - with UN inspection
tags still on them -- as far afield as Jordan, Turkey and even Holland.
Notably absent from that list is Iraq's western neighbor Syria, ruled by
its own Baath Party just like Saddam's and closed to even the thought of
an UNMOVIC inspection. Israeli intelligence has been reporting the
large-scale smuggling of Saddam's WMD program across the Syrian border
since at least two months before the war. Syria has long been the
world's foremost state-sponsor of terrorism.
Perricos highlighted the proliferation danger to the Security Council,
as well he should: UNMOVIC has no idea where most of the WMD material is
today, just that it exists and it's gone; and anything in Syria is
likely to be in Jerusalem or New York tomorrow.
This is the biggest news story of 2004 so far. Yet you haven't heard
about it, have you?
You probably haven't heard about Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin
either -- a socialist and no friend of America. Addressing a group of
700 university researchers and business leaders in Montreal last month,
Martin stated bluntly that terrorists have acquired WMDs from Saddam.
“The fact is that there is now, we know well, a proliferation of nuclear
weapons, and that many weapons that Saddam Huseein had, we don't know
where they are…. [T]errorists have access to all of them,” the Canadian
premier warned.
The tip of this terrorist sword was scarcely deflected on April 26th,
when Jordanian intelligence broke up an al Qaeda conspiracy to detonate
a large chemical device in the capital city of Amman. Directed by al
Qaeda terrorist leader Abu al-Zarqawi -- the same man who personally
beheaded American Nicholas Berg in Iraq last month -- the plotters
sought to use a massive explosion to spread a “toxic cloud”, meant to
wipe out the U.S. embassy, the Jordanian prime minister's office, the
Jordanian intelligence headquarters, and at least 20,000 civilians (by
contrast, only 3,000 died on 9/11). Over twenty tons of chemical weapons
were seized from the conspirators, who were just days away from carrying
out their plot.
One wonders where CNN and USA Today think twenty tons of nerve gas and
sarin came from: Chemical Weapons-Mart? Yet their coverage, like most
major media outlets, mentioned not a word about Saddam's smuggled WMDs,
which -- according to liberal dogma -- “don't exist.”
Even though the UN says they do exist, now spread around the world.
It's not just the UN. Bill Clinton says they exist, even after the war:
in a July 2003 interview with Larry King, the ex-president
uncharacteristically defended George Bush, saying “it is incontestable
that on the day I left office, there [was]…a substantial amount of
biological and chemical material unaccounted for” in Iraq. Every
intelligence agency in the world -- French, British, German, Russian,
Czech, you name it -- agreed before the war; Jordanian intelligence can
certainly confirm their opinion today.
So what's the deal? Why the relentless pretence that “Bush lied” when
even the UN and Bill Clinton say he didn't? Why the absolute silence
about “inconvenient” parts of various UN reports, such as the discovery
of chemical and biological weapons plans, recipes and equipment; of
bio-weapons agents in an Iraqi scientist's house; of a prison lab for
testing bio weapons on humans; of complexes for manufacturing fuel for
prohibited long-range missiles; of artillery rounds containing enough
sarin to kill thousands of people, of similar shells containing mustard
gas, two (but far from the only) of which were used in a terrorist
attack against U.S. forces just weeks ago?
America cannot afford the answer to this “why”: that many on the left
consider George W. Bush's defeat more urgent than al Qaeda's, his
political death more essential than the possible physical death of
millions of Americans.
The character of our foreign enemies has never been in doubt. The
character of the enemy within -- from Dan Rather to Michael Moore -- has
never been clearer. And the stakes are the highest they've ever been.
America has been feed and swallowed
a BIG LIE about Iraqi WMDs, and it wasn't from George Bush.
It was and continues to be from the New York Times, LA Times,
Whorllywood, NPR and most of the other major media outlets.
In fact, the U.N. now confirms that Iraq's WMDs were smuggled out-
they have even shown up in Holland (?!).
The bottom line is obvious: the leftist care far more about
grasping personal power than defending our people.
The do not care that their back-shooting is costing
our soldier's lives. They care only for their own perks,
and they will tell any lie, no matter how destructive.
And their sheep will believe it.
-------
UN Confirms: WMDs Smuggled Out of Iraq
© June 18, 2004, Rod D. Martin
Vangard
In a report which might alternately be termed “stunning” or
“terrifying”, United Nations weapons inspectors confirmed last week not
merely that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, but that he
smuggled them out of his country, before, during and after the war.
Late last week, the UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection
Commission (UNMOVIC) briefed the Security Council on Saddam's
lightning-fast dismantling of missile and WMD sites before and during
the war. UNMOVIC executive chairman Demetrius Perricos detailed not only
the export of thousands of tons of missile components, nuclear reactor
vessels and fermenters for chemical and biological warheads, but also
the discovery of many (but not most) of these items - with UN inspection
tags still on them -- as far afield as Jordan, Turkey and even Holland.
Notably absent from that list is Iraq's western neighbor Syria, ruled by
its own Baath Party just like Saddam's and closed to even the thought of
an UNMOVIC inspection. Israeli intelligence has been reporting the
large-scale smuggling of Saddam's WMD program across the Syrian border
since at least two months before the war. Syria has long been the
world's foremost state-sponsor of terrorism.
Perricos highlighted the proliferation danger to the Security Council,
as well he should: UNMOVIC has no idea where most of the WMD material is
today, just that it exists and it's gone; and anything in Syria is
likely to be in Jerusalem or New York tomorrow.
This is the biggest news story of 2004 so far. Yet you haven't heard
about it, have you?
You probably haven't heard about Canada's Prime Minister Paul Martin
either -- a socialist and no friend of America. Addressing a group of
700 university researchers and business leaders in Montreal last month,
Martin stated bluntly that terrorists have acquired WMDs from Saddam.
“The fact is that there is now, we know well, a proliferation of nuclear
weapons, and that many weapons that Saddam Huseein had, we don't know
where they are…. [T]errorists have access to all of them,” the Canadian
premier warned.
The tip of this terrorist sword was scarcely deflected on April 26th,
when Jordanian intelligence broke up an al Qaeda conspiracy to detonate
a large chemical device in the capital city of Amman. Directed by al
Qaeda terrorist leader Abu al-Zarqawi -- the same man who personally
beheaded American Nicholas Berg in Iraq last month -- the plotters
sought to use a massive explosion to spread a “toxic cloud”, meant to
wipe out the U.S. embassy, the Jordanian prime minister's office, the
Jordanian intelligence headquarters, and at least 20,000 civilians (by
contrast, only 3,000 died on 9/11). Over twenty tons of chemical weapons
were seized from the conspirators, who were just days away from carrying
out their plot.
One wonders where CNN and USA Today think twenty tons of nerve gas and
sarin came from: Chemical Weapons-Mart? Yet their coverage, like most
major media outlets, mentioned not a word about Saddam's smuggled WMDs,
which -- according to liberal dogma -- “don't exist.”
Even though the UN says they do exist, now spread around the world.
It's not just the UN. Bill Clinton says they exist, even after the war:
in a July 2003 interview with Larry King, the ex-president
uncharacteristically defended George Bush, saying “it is incontestable
that on the day I left office, there [was]…a substantial amount of
biological and chemical material unaccounted for” in Iraq. Every
intelligence agency in the world -- French, British, German, Russian,
Czech, you name it -- agreed before the war; Jordanian intelligence can
certainly confirm their opinion today.
So what's the deal? Why the relentless pretence that “Bush lied” when
even the UN and Bill Clinton say he didn't? Why the absolute silence
about “inconvenient” parts of various UN reports, such as the discovery
of chemical and biological weapons plans, recipes and equipment; of
bio-weapons agents in an Iraqi scientist's house; of a prison lab for
testing bio weapons on humans; of complexes for manufacturing fuel for
prohibited long-range missiles; of artillery rounds containing enough
sarin to kill thousands of people, of similar shells containing mustard
gas, two (but far from the only) of which were used in a terrorist
attack against U.S. forces just weeks ago?
America cannot afford the answer to this “why”: that many on the left
consider George W. Bush's defeat more urgent than al Qaeda's, his
political death more essential than the possible physical death of
millions of Americans.
The character of our foreign enemies has never been in doubt. The
character of the enemy within -- from Dan Rather to Michael Moore -- has
never been clearer. And the stakes are the highest they've ever been.